Intussusception - Quick Consult
Last Updated / Reviewed: June 2022

Definition
Key History
Key Physical Exam
Risk Factors for Intussusception
Differential Diagnosis
Diagnostic Testing
Clinical Risk and Safety Pearls
Treatment
Complications

Definition

Intussusception is the invagination of part of the intestine into itself. It is the most common abdominal emergency in early childhood. Intussusception is the most common cause of intestinal obstruction in children between 6 and 36 months of age. 60% are younger than one year old and 80% are younger than two years old.

There is now an increasing body of evidence that suggests that viral triggers may play a role in some cases. The incidence of intussusception has a seasonal variation; approximately 30% of patients experience viral illness before the onset; and there appears to be a strong association with adenovirus infection.

Back To Top

Key History

  • Sudden onset, intermittent, severe, progressively worsening abdominal pain
  • Relief from pain in between episodes
  • Inconsolable crying
  • Drawing legs up toward the abdomen
  • Episodes typically occur at 15 to 20 minute intervals – increasing in severity and frequency over time.
  • Vomiting follows the onset of abdominal pain.
  • Lethargy as symptoms progress
  • Stool with gross blood – in up to 70% of cases
  • Stool mixed with mucous and blood – currant jelly appearance in about 20% of cases
  • Classic triad – currant-jelly stool, sausage-like abdominal mass in RUQ and pain, seen in less than 15% of patients
  • Up to 20% of infants have no obvious pain.
  • Approximately 33% of patients do not pass blood or mucus or develop an abdominal mass.
Back To Top

Key Physical Exam

  • Sausage-shaped abdominal mass in RUQ
  • If event witnessed, infant drawing leg up to abdomen, and in obvious severe pain.
Back To Top

Risk Factors for Intussusception

  • Recent rotavirus vaccination
  • Antecedent viral illness
  • Adenovirus may be a trigger
  • Postoperative small bowel intussusception
  • Henoch-Schönlein purpura
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Meckel’s diverticulum
  • Small bowel lymphoma
  • Intestinal parasites – ascaris lumbricoides
  • Celiac disease
  • Crohn’s disease
Back To Top

Differential Diagnosis

  • Adhesive band small bowel obstruction
  • Appendicitis
  • Gastroenteritis
  • Incarcerated hernia
Back To Top

Diagnostic Testing

Text / literature information and recommendations include:
  1. Imaging:
    • Ultrasound – should be the first study when the diagnosis is ambiguous; accuracy of ultrasound for intussusception approaches 100%.
    • CT – can identify intussusception, but is time consuming and best used for patients for whom the other imaging modalities are unrevealing.
    • Air contrast enema study – is the standard procedure for diagnosis and treatment for children with high suspicion of intussusception.
    • Plain abdominal films – are not highly useful except if needed to rule out perforation, which would contraindicate air contrast enema.
  2. Labs:
    • CBC
    • Urinalysis
    • Electrolytes
    • Stool guaiac
Back To Top

Clinical Risk and Safety Pearls

  • Maintain a high index of suspicion for intussusception in this age group.
  • The initial presenting sign may be lethargy or altered consciousness alone. Thus intussusception is often confused with sepsis.
  • Intussusception should be considered in the evaluation of lethargy or altered consciousness, especially in infants.
  • Prior to the air contrast enema study the patient should be stabilized and prepped for surgery in the event surgery becomes necessary. The surgical team should be notified before the enema is performed.
  • The lead point is the leading edge of the intussusception and is usually seen in older children and may be due to an anatomic anomaly such as Meckel’s diverticulum, polyp or lymphoma.
  • Classic triad – currant-jelly stool, sausage abdominal mass in RUQ and pain seen in less than 15% of patients
  • Approximately 33% of patients do not pass blood or mucus or develop an abdominal mass.
Back To Top

Treatment

Common text / literature recommendations include:
  1. ABCs
  2. Notify surgical consultant prior to enema.
  3. The standard procedure for diagnosis and treatment of intussusception is a contrast enema.
  4. NG tube for gastric decompression
  5. Air or carbon dioxide reduction techniques are also being used successfully and have the advantage of less radiation and cost. When perforation is noted with air reduction the colonic wall tears are smaller compared with hydrostatic contrast techniques.
  6. Surgery is indicated when nonsurgical attempts at reduction are incomplete or unsuccessful.
  7. Enema reduction is contraindicated if there is free air, air fluid levels, peritonitis, perforation, hypovolemic shock, or currant-jelly stools for more than 24 hours.
Back To Top

Complications

  • Perforation of bowel – risk is higher the longer the intussusception has been present
  • Recurrence after successful nonoperative reduction is about 10%. Recurrence is not necessarily an indication for surgery. Each recurrence should be handled as if it were the first episode.
Back To Top
  1. Arbizu RA, Aljomah G, Kozielski R, et al. Intussusception associated with adenovirus. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014; 59:e41.
  2. Carroll AG, Kavanagh RG, Ni Leidhin C, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Intussusception: A Critically Appraised Topic. Acad Radiol. 2017; 24:521.
  3. Charles T, Penninga L, Reurings JC, Berry MC. Intussusception in children: A clinical review. Acta Chir Belg. 2015;115(5):327-333.
  4. Edwards EA, Pigg N, Courtier J, Zapala MA, MacKenzie JD, Phelps AS. Intussusception: Past, present and future. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(9):1101-1108.
  5. Fleischman R. Chapter 130: Acute Abdominal Pain in Infants and Children. In: Tintinalli's Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
  6. Gluckman S, Karpelowsky J, Webster AC, McGee RG. Management for intussusception in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6.
  7. Mandeville K, Chien M, Willyerd FA, et al. Intussusception: clinical presentations and imaging characteristics. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012; 28:842.
  8. Ntoulia A, Tharakan SJ, Reid JR, Mahboubi S. Failed Intussusception Reduction in Children: Correlation Between Radiologic, Surgical, and Pathologic Findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 207:424.

This is intended solely as reference material and is not a recommendation for any specific patient. The practitioner must rely upon his or her own professional judgment and medical decision-making to determine whether it is relevant in a particular case. Materials are derived from medical and nursing texts, medical literature and national guidelines and should not be considered complete or authoritative. Users must rely on specific patient presentation, experience and judgment when utilizing any of the information contained herein relative to an actual patient.

© 2008 - 2024 The Sullivan Group. All rights to TSG RSQ® Resources are reserved. Unauthorized copying or dissemination is prohibited. U.S. Patent No. 7,197,492